Difference between revisions of "Discharge - Ott ADC"

From Experimental Hydrology Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{| align="right"
 +
|[[Image:ADC.JPG|right|220px|ADC]]
 +
|}
 +
 +
 
==Parameter to be measured:==
 
==Parameter to be measured:==
 
Flow velocity (, discharge)
 
Flow velocity (, discharge)
Line 21: Line 26:
 
==Disadvantages:==
 
==Disadvantages:==
 
* heavy rods with coarse scale
 
* heavy rods with coarse scale
* sensor positioning indicator is difficult to read when adjusting sensor height or rod must be held without ground contact
 
 
* test device showed signs of rainwater entering the display
 
* test device showed signs of rainwater entering the display
 
* built-in batteries, cannot be changed by user
 
* built-in batteries, cannot be changed by user
 
  
 
==What to watch out for:==
 
==What to watch out for:==
* cloudy waters, back pain (when adjusting depth of the probe free-hanging)
+
* turbulent flow can cause the device to reject the measurements. Newer versions of the firmware provide (apart form additional quality check features) options to control that - look for new versions on the OTT-website
 +
* back pain (when adjusting depth of the probe free-hanging) - use sliding rod or makeshift additional support for holding the rod
 +
* the wall charger seems to use more than 12 V put on a standard mini-USB plug - rather don't try to charge standard devices with that power supply!
  
 +
==Links==
 +
[[ Discharge - comparison of measurements (C2, Flowtracker, Flowsens, ADC, tracer, dipping rod) ]]
  
==Links==
 
 
Other related web sites:
 
Other related web sites:
* Discharge measurements by Current meter, Flowsens, Flowtracker, ADC & Tracer dilution - Experiences from Student Fieldwork Course (coming soon)
 
  
 
Projects that used the above equipment:
 
Projects that used the above equipment:

Latest revision as of 11:39, 19 September 2016

ADC


Parameter to be measured:

Flow velocity (, discharge)

Method:

ultrasonic reflectogram cross-correlation

Equipment:

  • probe
  • display unit
  • wading rod

Advantages:

  • on-site discharge computation
  • powerful quality checking, configuration and data storage options
  • integrated depth measurement and sensor positioning indicator
  • convenient software with visualisation capabilities
  • USB (no serial port required)
  • rechargable via USB


Disadvantages:

  • heavy rods with coarse scale
  • test device showed signs of rainwater entering the display
  • built-in batteries, cannot be changed by user

What to watch out for:

  • turbulent flow can cause the device to reject the measurements. Newer versions of the firmware provide (apart form additional quality check features) options to control that - look for new versions on the OTT-website
  • back pain (when adjusting depth of the probe free-hanging) - use sliding rod or makeshift additional support for holding the rod
  • the wall charger seems to use more than 12 V put on a standard mini-USB plug - rather don't try to charge standard devices with that power supply!

Links

Discharge - comparison of measurements (C2, Flowtracker, Flowsens, ADC, tracer, dipping rod)

Other related web sites:

Projects that used the above equipment: -

References

http://www.ott-hydrometry.de/web/ott_de.nsf/id/pa_adc_e.html