Difference between revisions of "Discharge - Ott ADC"

From Experimental Hydrology Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 31: Line 31:
  
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
 +
[[ Discharge - comparison of measurements (C2, Flowtracker, Flowsens, ADC, tracer) ]]
 +
 
Other related web sites:
 
Other related web sites:
* Discharge measurements by Current meter, Flowsens, Flowtracker, ADC & Tracer dilution - Experiences from Student Fieldwork Course (coming soon)
 
  
 
Projects that used the above equipment:
 
Projects that used the above equipment:

Revision as of 13:28, 29 September 2009

Parameter to be measured:

Flow velocity (, discharge)

Method:

ultrasonic reflectogram cross-correlation

Equipment:

  • probe
  • display unit
  • wading rod

Advantages:

  • on-site discharge computation
  • powerful quality checking, configuration and data storage options
  • integrated depth measurement and sensor positioning indicator
  • convenient software with visualisation capabilities
  • USB (no serial port required)
  • rechargable via USB


Disadvantages:

  • heavy rods with coarse scale
  • sensor positioning indicator is difficult to read when adjusting sensor height or rod must be held without ground contact
  • test device showed signs of rainwater entering the display
  • built-in batteries, cannot be changed by user


What to watch out for:

  • cloudy waters, back pain (when adjusting depth of the probe free-hanging)


Links

Discharge - comparison of measurements (C2, Flowtracker, Flowsens, ADC, tracer)

Other related web sites:

Projects that used the above equipment: -

References

http://www.ott-hydrometry.de/web/ott_de.nsf/id/pa_adc_e.html