Difference between revisions of "Soil moisture - impedance method (Theta Probe)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Links) |
|||
| (37 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[File:ThetaprobeMl2x.jpg|thumb|right|ML2 probe with hand held HH2]] | ||
| + | [[File:Ml3 deltaT.jpg|thumb|right|ML3 probe]] | ||
==Parameter to be measured:== | ==Parameter to be measured:== | ||
| − | Soil moisture | + | *old ML2: Soil moisture, permitivity for a volume of 300mm³ (60mm long x 26.5mm |
| + | diameter). | ||
| + | *new ML3: soil moisture and temperature | ||
==Method:== | ==Method:== | ||
| − | + | Frequency Domain Sensor working with the so called impedance-method at 100 MHz. | |
| + | Usable in saline soils - up to 2000 mS/m. | ||
==Equipment:== | ==Equipment:== | ||
| − | *Delta-T Device: Theta-Probe (ML2x) | + | *Delta-T Device: Theta-Probe (ML2x) with 4 rods of 600 mm length, HH2 display for manual reading or a data logger |
| − | * | + | * Reqiuerments to loggers: Requires 5 - 15V DC at 20mA. Provides 0 - 1V DC output. |
==Advantages:== | ==Advantages:== | ||
| − | *easy and fast measurement of punctual soil moisture | + | * easy and fast measurement of punctual soil moisture |
| − | *manual as well as continuously logged measurements possible | + | * manual as well as continuously logged measurements possible in that case long cable runs possible. |
==Disadvantages:== | ==Disadvantages:== | ||
| − | *Each sensor has to be calibrated | + | * Each sensor has to be calibrated |
| − | *careful application of probe in stony soils | + | * careful application of probe in stony and dry soils, because rods break easy |
| − | *Underestimating of | + | * during field application cable breakes often occures at the crossing between probe head and cable |
| + | * Underestimating of permitivity in media with low permitivity (ε > 40, clay and organic soils) | ||
| + | * unaccuarate values in saturated media | ||
==What to watch out for:== | ==What to watch out for:== | ||
| − | *Good contact between probe and medium has to be | + | *Good contact between probe and medium has to be proved |
==Problems/Questions:== | ==Problems/Questions:== | ||
| + | ==Price:== | ||
| + | * 1270 € for ML2 probe and HH2 (2008) | ||
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Projects that used the above equipment: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [http://www.uni-potsdam.de/echo/ The ECHO project] | ||
| + | * [http://www.comtess.uni-oldenburg.de/ COMTESS] | ||
Other related web sites: | Other related web sites: | ||
*John Miller Theta Probe: [http://www.macaulay.ac.uk/MRCS/pdf/tprobe.pdf Theta Probe ML2X Principles of operation and application] | *John Miller Theta Probe: [http://www.macaulay.ac.uk/MRCS/pdf/tprobe.pdf Theta Probe ML2X Principles of operation and application] | ||
| + | *Delta-T Devices: | ||
| + | **[http://upgmbh.com/fileadmin/produkte/support/ML2x_Theta_ProbeUserManual_v1.21.pdf User Manual of the old ML2 probe] | ||
| + | **[http://www.delta-t.co.uk/product-display.asp?id=ML3%20Product&div=Soil%20Science User Manual of the new ML3 probe] | ||
| − | + | ==References== | |
| − | + | Blonquist, JM; Jones, SB; Robinson, DA. 2005. Standardizing characterization of electromagnetic water content sensors: Part 2. Evaluation of seven sensing systems. VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL 4(4), 1059-1069. | |
| + | Gaskin, GJ; Miller, JD. 1996. Measurement of soil water content using a simplified impedance measuring technique. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH 63(2), 153-159. | ||
| − | + | Miller, JD; Gaskin, GJ; Anderson, HA. 1997. From drought to flood: Catchment responses revealed using novel soil water probes. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES 11(5), 533-541. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | Gaskin, GJ; | ||
| − | + | Robinson, D.A., Gardner, C.M.K., Cooper, J.D. 1999. Measurement of relative permittivity in sandy soils using TDR, capacitance and theta probes: comparison, including the effects of bulk soil electrical conductivity. Jounral of Hydrology 223, 198-211. | |
| − | Seyfried, MS; Murdock, MD. 2004. Measurement of soil water content with a 50-MHz soil dielectric sensor. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL 68 (2) | + | Seyfried, MS; Murdock, MD. 2004. Measurement of soil water content with a 50-MHz soil dielectric sensor. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL 68(2), 394-403. |
[[Category:Equipment]] | [[Category:Equipment]] | ||
[[Category: Soil Moisture]] | [[Category: Soil Moisture]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:29, 13 January 2015
Parameter to be measured:
- old ML2: Soil moisture, permitivity for a volume of 300mm³ (60mm long x 26.5mm
diameter).
- new ML3: soil moisture and temperature
Method:
Frequency Domain Sensor working with the so called impedance-method at 100 MHz. Usable in saline soils - up to 2000 mS/m.
Equipment:
- Delta-T Device: Theta-Probe (ML2x) with 4 rods of 600 mm length, HH2 display for manual reading or a data logger
- Reqiuerments to loggers: Requires 5 - 15V DC at 20mA. Provides 0 - 1V DC output.
Advantages:
- easy and fast measurement of punctual soil moisture
- manual as well as continuously logged measurements possible in that case long cable runs possible.
Disadvantages:
- Each sensor has to be calibrated
- careful application of probe in stony and dry soils, because rods break easy
- during field application cable breakes often occures at the crossing between probe head and cable
- Underestimating of permitivity in media with low permitivity (ε > 40, clay and organic soils)
- unaccuarate values in saturated media
What to watch out for:
- Good contact between probe and medium has to be proved
Problems/Questions:
Price:
- 1270 € for ML2 probe and HH2 (2008)
Links
Projects that used the above equipment:
Other related web sites:
- John Miller Theta Probe: Theta Probe ML2X Principles of operation and application
- Delta-T Devices:
References
Blonquist, JM; Jones, SB; Robinson, DA. 2005. Standardizing characterization of electromagnetic water content sensors: Part 2. Evaluation of seven sensing systems. VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL 4(4), 1059-1069.
Gaskin, GJ; Miller, JD. 1996. Measurement of soil water content using a simplified impedance measuring technique. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH 63(2), 153-159.
Miller, JD; Gaskin, GJ; Anderson, HA. 1997. From drought to flood: Catchment responses revealed using novel soil water probes. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES 11(5), 533-541.
Robinson, D.A., Gardner, C.M.K., Cooper, J.D. 1999. Measurement of relative permittivity in sandy soils using TDR, capacitance and theta probes: comparison, including the effects of bulk soil electrical conductivity. Jounral of Hydrology 223, 198-211.
Seyfried, MS; Murdock, MD. 2004. Measurement of soil water content with a 50-MHz soil dielectric sensor. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL 68(2), 394-403.