Difference between revisions of "Soil moisture - impedance method (Theta Probe)"

From Experimental Hydrology Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
==Advantages:==
 
==Advantages:==
*easy and fast measurement of punctual soil moisture
+
* easy and fast measurement of punctual soil moisture
*manual as well as continuously logged measurements possible
+
* manual as well as continuously logged measurements possible
  
 
==Disadvantages:==
 
==Disadvantages:==
*Each sensor has to be calibrated
+
* Each sensor has to be calibrated
*careful application of probe in stony soils  
+
* careful application of probe in stony soils  
*Underestimating of permitivity in media with low permitivity (ε > 40, clay and organic soils)
+
* Underestimating of permitivity in media with low permitivity (ε > 40, clay and organic soils)
 +
* unaccuarate values in saturated media
  
 
==What to watch out for:==
 
==What to watch out for:==

Revision as of 12:06, 18 December 2008

Ml2x.jpg

Parameter to be measured:

Soil moisture, permitivity

Method:

Impedance-method

Equipment:

  • Delta-T Device: Theta-Probe (ML2x) with 4 rods of 600 mm length, HH2 display for manual reading or a data logger

Advantages:

  • easy and fast measurement of punctual soil moisture
  • manual as well as continuously logged measurements possible

Disadvantages:

  • Each sensor has to be calibrated
  • careful application of probe in stony soils
  • Underestimating of permitivity in media with low permitivity (ε > 40, clay and organic soils)
  • unaccuarate values in saturated media

What to watch out for:

  • Good contact between probe and medium has to be proved

Problems/Questions:

Links

Other related web sites:

References

Blonquist, JM; Jones, SB; Robinson, DA. 2005. Standardizing characterization of electromagnetic water content sensors: Part 2. Evaluation of seven sensing systems. VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL 4 (4): 1059-1069.

Gaskin, GJ; Miller, JD. 1996. Measurement of soil water content using a simplified impedance measuring technique. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH 63 (2): 153-159.

Miller, JD; Gaskin, GJ; Anderson, HA. 1997. From drought to flood: Catchment responses revealed using novel soil water probes. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES 11 (5): 533-541.

Seyfried, MS; Murdock, MD. 2004. Measurement of soil water content with a 50-MHz soil dielectric sensor. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL 68 (2): 394-403.