Difference between revisions of "Discharge - Current meter Ott C2"

From Experimental Hydrology Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: ==Parameter to be measured:== Flow velocity (, discharge) ==Method:== propeller ==Equipment:== C2: * propellers * axle * wading rod counting unit (e.g. Ott Z400) ==Advantages:== * simpl...)
 
m
Line 30: Line 30:
  
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
 +
[[ Discharge - comparison of measurements (C2, Flowtracker, Flowsens, ADC, tracer) ]]
 +
 
Other related web sites:
 
Other related web sites:
* Discharge measurements by Current meter, Flowsens, Flowtracker, ADC & Tracer dilution - Experiences from Student Fieldwork Course (coming soon)
 
  
 
Projects that used the above equipment:
 
Projects that used the above equipment:

Revision as of 13:26, 29 September 2009

Parameter to be measured:

Flow velocity (, discharge)

Method:

propeller

Equipment:

C2:

  • propellers
  • axle
  • wading rod

counting unit (e.g. Ott Z400)

Advantages:

  • simple no-fuss mechanics
  • "sensor" (propeller) response is directly visual
  • comparatively small case including wading rods


Disadvantages:

  • poor response in low velocities
  • maintainance of ball bearings (oil)
  • mechanical vulnarability
  • no immediate calculation of discharge, no data storage?


What to watch out for:

  • submerged weeds, low velocities, piranhas


Links

Discharge - comparison of measurements (C2, Flowtracker, Flowsens, ADC, tracer)

Other related web sites:

Projects that used the above equipment: http://brandenburg.geoecology.uni-potsdam.de/projekte/sesam/


References

http://www.ott-hydrometry.de/web/ott_de.nsf/id/pa_c2_e.html