Difference between revisions of "Discharge - electromagnetic flowmeter FlowSens"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {| align="right" | ||
+ | |[[Image:Flowsens.JPG|right|220px|ADC]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
==Parameter to be measured:== | ==Parameter to be measured:== | ||
Flow velocity (, discharge) | Flow velocity (, discharge) | ||
− | |||
==Method:== | ==Method:== | ||
Line 36: | Line 39: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
− | http://www. | + | [http://www.seba-hydrometrie.com/fileadmin/files/05_Hand_MobileGeraete/B07_FlowSens_e_S1-2_%26.pdf Flowsense description SEBA] |
[[Category:Equipment]] | [[Category:Equipment]] |
Latest revision as of 11:04, 22 September 2015
Parameter to be measured:
Flow velocity (, discharge)
Method:
electromagnetic
Equipment:
- probe
- display unit
- wading rod
Advantages:
- direct display of velocity and its standard deviation
- sturdy design
- apparently insensitive to mechanical interference, sensor fouling, high sediment concentrations,...
Disadvantages:
- bulky display unit
- heavy rods with coarse scale
- (data storage not tested)
What to watch out for:
- irritated electric eels
Links
Discharge - comparison of measurements (C2, Flowtracker, Flowsens, ADC, tracer, dipping rod)
Other related web sites:
Projects that used the above equipment: -