Difference between revisions of "Discharge - ultrasonic Doppler FlowTracker"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Image:flowtracker.JPG]] | + | {| align="right" |
| + | |[[Image:flowtracker.JPG|right|220px|ADC]] | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
==Parameter to be measured:== | ==Parameter to be measured:== | ||
Flow velocity (, discharge) | Flow velocity (, discharge) | ||
Revision as of 09:29, 19 September 2011
 |
Parameter to be measured:
Flow velocity (, discharge)
Method:
2D/3D ultrasonic Doppler
Equipment:
- sensor + display unit
- adjustable wading rod
Advantages:
- on-site discharge computation
- powerful quality checking, configuration and data storage options
- self-explaining menu system, well-labelled keys
- velocity measurement with 2D or 3D components
- convenient sensor height adjustment from above the water
- comparatively light rods, all packed in single sturdy case
- easy-to-use software with basis visualisation capabilities
Disadvantages:
- depth scale of fixed rod hard to read (no numbers)
- scale of adjusting rod confusing and useless for everything but 1-point-verticals
- high sensitivity to mud-clouds
- sensor contact with the mud may produce very high velocity measurements
- sensor and display-unit cannot be separated - impractical when handling the unit for data-retrieval
- heavy and bulky transport case
What to watch out for:
- sensor contact with bottom sediment, cloudy water, confusing scale, annoyed freshwater bats
Price:
- ~ 11000 € (2008)
Links
Discharge - comparison of measurements (C2, Flowtracker, Flowsens, ADC, tracer, dipping rod)
Other related web sites:
Projects that used the above equipment: -