Difference between revisions of "Discharge - ultrasonic Doppler FlowTracker"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: ==Parameter to be measured:== Flow velocity (, discharge) ==Method:== 2D/3D ultrasonic Doppler ==Equipment:== * sensor + display unit * adjustable wading rod ==Advantages:== * on-site d...) |
m |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
| + | [[ Discharge - comparison of measurements (C2, Flowtracker, Flowsens, ADC, tracer) ]] | ||
| + | |||
Other related web sites: | Other related web sites: | ||
| − | |||
Projects that used the above equipment: | Projects that used the above equipment: | ||
Revision as of 13:27, 29 September 2009
Parameter to be measured:
Flow velocity (, discharge)
Method:
2D/3D ultrasonic Doppler
Equipment:
- sensor + display unit
- adjustable wading rod
Advantages:
- on-site discharge computation
- powerful quality checking, configuration and data storage options
- self-explaining menu system, well-labelled keys
- velocity measurement with 2D or 3D components
- convenient sensor height adjustment from above the water
- comparatively light rods, all packed in single sturdy case
- easy-to-use software with basis visualisation capabilities
Disadvantages:
- depth scale of fixed rod hard to read (no numbers)
- scale of adjusting rod confusing and useless for everything but 1-point-verticals
- high sensitivity to mud-clouds
- sensor contact with the mud may produce very high velocity measurements
- sensor and display-unit cannot be separated - impractical when handling the unit for data-retrieval
- heavy and bulky transport case
What to watch out for:
- sensor contact with bottom sediment, cloudy water, confusing scale, annoyed freshwater bats
Links
Discharge - comparison of measurements (C2, Flowtracker, Flowsens, ADC, tracer)
Other related web sites:
Projects that used the above equipment: -