Difference between revisions of "Hydraulic Conductivity - Amoozemeter"

From Experimental Hydrology Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[Image:Amoozimeter.jpg|right|300px|]]
 +
[[Image:Amoozi.jpg|left|300px|]]
 
==Parameter to be measured:==
 
==Parameter to be measured:==
 
Hydraulic conductivity
 
Hydraulic conductivity
  
 
==Method:==
 
==Method:==
Constant head permeameter: Measures infiltration rate within an auger hole up to a depth of 2m and with extension set up to a depth of 4 m. A constant hydraulic head is kept in the auger hole .
+
Constant head permeameter: Measures infiltration rate within an auger hole up to a depth of 2 m and with extension set up to a depth of 4 m. A constant hydraulic head is kept in the auger hole which must be H/r >= 5 and the infiltration rate will be monitored until steady state flow is attained. Hydraulic conductivity will be calculated with the equation of Glover (Amoozegar, 1989b, 1993)
  
 
==Equipment:==
 
==Equipment:==
*  
+
* Constant head permeameter with reservoir (with combined) Mariotte-bottle
 +
* dissipation unit
 +
* auger drill equipment
 +
* measure tabe or folding meter stick
 +
* datasheets, stop watch, torch for deep holes
 +
* water vessels for supply
 +
 
  
 
==Advantages:==
 
==Advantages:==
 
* in-situ measurement, no analysis of disturbed soil samples in lab  
 
* in-situ measurement, no analysis of disturbed soil samples in lab  
 
* measurement in different depths of soil profile
 
* measurement in different depths of soil profile
* easily transportable for measurements at any location
+
* easily transportable for monitoring at any location
 
* less water consume
 
* less water consume
  
Line 18: Line 26:
 
* price
 
* price
 
* exact geometry of auger hole as specified in the equation is not often realised
 
* exact geometry of auger hole as specified in the equation is not often realised
* in depth up to 70 cm the measurment is complicated because of control water level
+
* in depth up to 70 cm the measurment is complicated because of controling water level
 +
* soils with high content of gravels and boulders would be problematic because of realsing the correct geometry of the auger hole
  
 
==What to watch out for:==
 
==What to watch out for:==
Line 28: Line 37:
 
* effects of impermeable layers before stationarity is achieved
 
* effects of impermeable layers before stationarity is achieved
 
* inclined, uneven surfaces
 
* inclined, uneven surfaces
 +
* in loamy and clay soils the augering will smear up the soil pores which will lead to an underestimation of hydraulic conductivity
  
  
 
==Problems/Questions:==
 
==Problems/Questions:==
 +
  
  
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
 +
 +
  
 
Projects that used the above equipment:
 
Projects that used the above equipment:
 +
 +
* [http://www.uni-potsdam.de/echo/ The ECHO project]
 +
* [http://www.grosshang.de/index.php/naturalslope.html Natural Slope]
 +
* [http://brandenburg.geoecology.uni-potsdam.de/projekte/sesam/ SESAM II]
  
 
Other related web sites:
 
Other related web sites:
 +
* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pkBUl9sdOc How to Use an Amoozemeter for Soil Ksat movie]
 +
* [ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/NSSC/training/TSS_Course/Participant%20Materials/04-Site_Investigations/04-amoozemeter.pdf Introduction to the Amoozemeter]
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
+
*Amoozegar, A, 1989a. A compact, constant-head permeameter for measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity of the vadose zone, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53, 1356–1361.
 +
*Amoozegar, A, 1989b. Comparison of the Glover solution with the simultaneous equations approach for measuring hydraulic onductivity, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53, 1362–1367.
 +
*Amoozegar, A, 1993. Comments on ‘‘Methods for analyzing constanthead well permeameter data’’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 559– 560.
 +
*Amoozegar, A, 2005. Amoozemeter, in: Lal, R. Encyclopedia of Soil Science, Second Edition.
 +
*Elrick, DE, Reynolds WD, 1992. Methods for analyzing constanthead well permeameter data, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56, 320– 323.
 +
*Elrick, DE, Reynolds, WD, 1992. Methods for analyzing constanthead well permeameter data, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56, 320– 323.
 +
*Elsenbeer, H,  Newton, BE, Dunne T, de MoraesJM, 1999. Soil hydraulic conductivities of latosols under pasture, forest and teak in Rondonia, Brazil. Hydrol. Process. 13, 1417-1422.
 +
*Sobieraj, JA, Elsenbeer, H, Coelho, RM, Newton, B, 2002, Spatial variability of soil hydraulic conductivity along a ropical rainforest catena, Geoderma 108, 79–90.
 +
*Zigler, AD, Negishi, JN, Sidle, RC, Noguchi, S, Nik, AR, 2006. Impacts of logging disturbance on hillslope saturated hydraulic conductivity in a tropical forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Catena 67, 89 – 104.
  
  
 
[[Category:Equipment]]
 
[[Category:Equipment]]
 
[[Category:Hydraulic Conductivity]]
 
[[Category:Hydraulic Conductivity]]

Latest revision as of 11:02, 5 April 2012

Amoozimeter.jpg
Amoozi.jpg

Parameter to be measured:

Hydraulic conductivity

Method:

Constant head permeameter: Measures infiltration rate within an auger hole up to a depth of 2 m and with extension set up to a depth of 4 m. A constant hydraulic head is kept in the auger hole which must be H/r >= 5 and the infiltration rate will be monitored until steady state flow is attained. Hydraulic conductivity will be calculated with the equation of Glover (Amoozegar, 1989b, 1993)

Equipment:

  • Constant head permeameter with reservoir (with combined) Mariotte-bottle
  • dissipation unit
  • auger drill equipment
  • measure tabe or folding meter stick
  • datasheets, stop watch, torch for deep holes
  • water vessels for supply


Advantages:

  • in-situ measurement, no analysis of disturbed soil samples in lab
  • measurement in different depths of soil profile
  • easily transportable for monitoring at any location
  • less water consume

Disadvantages:

  • many pipes and valves - requires practice and understanding to recognise errors, set-up time
  • price
  • exact geometry of auger hole as specified in the equation is not often realised
  • in depth up to 70 cm the measurment is complicated because of controling water level
  • soils with high content of gravels and boulders would be problematic because of realsing the correct geometry of the auger hole

What to watch out for:

potential problems with

  • hydrophobic soils
  • heterogenous water content of soil before measurement
  • strong effects from preferential flowpaths
  • strong swelling/shrinking of soil
  • effects of impermeable layers before stationarity is achieved
  • inclined, uneven surfaces
  • in loamy and clay soils the augering will smear up the soil pores which will lead to an underestimation of hydraulic conductivity


Problems/Questions:

Links

Projects that used the above equipment:

Other related web sites:

References

  • Amoozegar, A, 1989a. A compact, constant-head permeameter for measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity of the vadose zone, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53, 1356–1361.
  • Amoozegar, A, 1989b. Comparison of the Glover solution with the simultaneous equations approach for measuring hydraulic onductivity, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53, 1362–1367.
  • Amoozegar, A, 1993. Comments on ‘‘Methods for analyzing constanthead well permeameter data’’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 559– 560.
  • Amoozegar, A, 2005. Amoozemeter, in: Lal, R. Encyclopedia of Soil Science, Second Edition.
  • Elrick, DE, Reynolds WD, 1992. Methods for analyzing constanthead well permeameter data, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56, 320– 323.
  • Elrick, DE, Reynolds, WD, 1992. Methods for analyzing constanthead well permeameter data, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56, 320– 323.
  • Elsenbeer, H, Newton, BE, Dunne T, de MoraesJM, 1999. Soil hydraulic conductivities of latosols under pasture, forest and teak in Rondonia, Brazil. Hydrol. Process. 13, 1417-1422.
  • Sobieraj, JA, Elsenbeer, H, Coelho, RM, Newton, B, 2002, Spatial variability of soil hydraulic conductivity along a ropical rainforest catena, Geoderma 108, 79–90.
  • Zigler, AD, Negishi, JN, Sidle, RC, Noguchi, S, Nik, AR, 2006. Impacts of logging disturbance on hillslope saturated hydraulic conductivity in a tropical forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Catena 67, 89 – 104.