Rainfall point measurement uncertainty

From Experimental Hydrology Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Typical quantitative results of rainfall uncertainty studies: Point Measurements.

This table originated from McMillan et al. (2012) but is now open to the community to add to and use as a resource.

Uncertainty Type Estimation Method Magnitude Location Reference
Systematic Errors
Wind loss curves dependent on wind speed & raindrop size Theoretical calculation using wind velocity field from wind tunnel experiments 1 mm drops: -10 % (6 m s-1), -40 % (9 m s-1), -80 % (12 m s-1); 2 mm drops: -10 % (9 m s-1), -20 % (12 m s-1); 3-5 mm drops: no effect up to 15 m s-1 Mueller & Kidder (1972)
Wind loss curves Comparison with shielded gauge Approx. linear 1 % under-catch per 1 mph wind speed Danville, Vermont, USA Larson & Peck (1974); also wind loss curves for snow
Undercatch for gauge mounted at 1 m height Comparison with pit gauge 5-16 % average undercatch (over 53-321 events), 0-75 % per storm USA: Reynolds Creek, Idaho; Pullman, Washington; Sidney, Montana; Ekalaka, Montana Neff (1977)
Loss due to wind field deformation WMO literature survey & pit gauge comparisons 2-10 % (rain), 10-50 % (snow) Sevruk (1982); extensive literature survey is still widely quoted; correction equations are given dependent on gauge type & meteorological conditions
Wetting loss 2-15 % (summer), 1-8 % (winter)
Evaporation loss from open container 0-4 %
Splash-in/out 1-2 %
Undercatch for shielded gauge at 12 inches height & turf wall gauge Comparison with pit gauge 5 % (unshielded), 2 % (turf wall) annual undercatch County Londonderry, Ireland. Lowland, coastal, rainfall 900-1100 mm yr-1. Essery & Wilcock (1991); 1976-1988
Wind-induced error depending on wind speed, rain drop size distribution & gauge design Comparison between exposed & pit gauges 2–10 % (hourly data; even after popular correction algorithms) ARS Goodwin Creek experimental watershed, Mississippi, USA. 21.4 km2, rainfall 1400 mm yr-1, 71-128 m a.s.l. Sieck et al. (2007)
Tipping error per 1 mm rain Field calibration with known water delivery rate Up to 10 % dependent on gauge type & rain rate
Random Errors
Coefficient of variation of random errors 12 co-located standard rain gauges Approx. 5 % for single storm, independent of total storm rainfall Mount Cargill, Dunedin, New Zealand. Exposed site at 560 m a.s.l. Hutchinson (1969)
Coefficient of variation of non-recording gauges 9 co-located recording & non-recording gauges 4-5 % for storms >15 mm (monsoon season thunderstorms) USDA Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed, Arizona, USA. 4.4 ha, semi-arid, 1250-1585 m a.s.l. Goodrich et al. (1995)
Total error of recording gauge Standard error between single gauges & average of 15 co-located tipping buckets Decreases with rain rate & accumulation time, e.g. 4.9 % (5 min) & 2.9 % (15 min) at rain rate of 10 mm h-1 USDA field station in Chickasha, Oklahoma, USA Ciach (2003)

References

Ciach, G.J., 2003. Local random errors in tipping-bucket rain gauge measurements. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 20(5): 752-759.

Essery, C.I., Wilcock, D.N., 1991. The variation in rainfall catch from standard UK Meteorological-Office rain-gages - A 12 year case-study. Hydrological Sciences Journal-Journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques, 36(1): 23-34.

Goodrich, D.C., Faures, J.M., Woolhiser, D.A., Lane, L.J., Sorooshian, S., 1995. Measurement and analysis of small-scale convective storm rainfall variability. Journal of Hydrology, 173(1-4): 283-308.

Hutchinson, P., 1969. A note on random rain-gauge errors. Journal of Hydrology (NZ), 8(1): 8-10.

Larson, L.W., Peck, E.L., 1974. Accuracy of precipitation measurements for hydrologic models. Water Resources Research, 10(4): 857-863.

McMillan, H., Krueger, T., Freer, J., 2012. Benchmarking observational uncertainties for hydrology: Rainfall, river discharge and water quality. Hydrological Processes 26(26): 4078–4111

Mueller, C.C., Kidder, E.H., 1972. Rain gage catch variation due to air-flow disturbances around a standard rain gage. Water Resources Research, 8(4): 1077-1082.

Neff, E.L., 1977. How much rain does a rain gauge gauge? Journal of Hydrology, 35: 213-220.

Sevruk, B., 1982. Methods of correction for systematic error in point precipitation measurement. World Meteorological Organisation, Operational Hydrology Report No. 21, WMO-No.589. Geneva, Switzerland.

Sieck, L.C., Burges, S.J., Steiner, M., 2007. Challenges in obtaining reliable measurements of point rainfall. Water Resources Research, 43(1): W01420.