Difference between revisions of "Soil moisture - capacitance (EC-10)"

From Experimental Hydrology Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
* Only for low salinity soils (Decagon has developed newer ECH<sub>2</sub>O probes that are less sensitive to salinity issues, e.g. the EC-5)
 
* Only for low salinity soils (Decagon has developed newer ECH<sub>2</sub>O probes that are less sensitive to salinity issues, e.g. the EC-5)
 
* Calibration needed
 
* Calibration needed
 +
* Small measurement volume compared to other sensors
  
 
==What to watch out for:==
 
==What to watch out for:==
 
* Temperature sensitivity
 
* Temperature sensitivity
 +
* Careful installation, air gaps have a sustainable influence on the measurement compared to other sensors because of the small measurement volume
  
 
==Problems/Questions:==
 
==Problems/Questions:==
Line 28: Line 30:
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
 
Projects that used the above equipment:
 
Projects that used the above equipment:
 
+
*[http://www.gfz-potsdam.de/pb5/pb54/projects/Hygra/content.html HYGRA – The effect of water storage variations on in-situ gravity measurements and their use for hydrology]
HYGRA
 
  
 
Other related web sites:
 
Other related web sites:
*[http://www.decagon.com/manuals/echomanual.pdf EC-5, EC-10, EC-20 Manual]
+
*[http://www.decagon.com/assets/Manuals/Manual-Soil-Moisture-Sensor-Ech2o.pdf EC-5, EC-10, EC-20 Manual]
[http://www.decagon.com/appnotes/echocal.pdf Decacon Device Calibrating ECH2O Soil Moisture Sensors]
+
*[http://www.decagon.com/assets/Uploads/Calibration-Equations-for-the-ECH2O-EC-5-ECH2o-TE-and-5TE-Sensors.pdf Calibration Equations or the ECH2O EC-5, ECH2O-TE and 5TE Sensors]
*http://www.decagon.com/Ech2o/
+
*[http://www.decagon.com/assets/Uploads/EC-5-Volume-of-Sensitivity.pdf EC-5 Volume of Sensitivity]
 
*[http://www.czen.org/files/2004_ECH2O_calibration_summary.ppt USGS ECH2O calibration summary]
 
*[http://www.czen.org/files/2004_ECH2O_calibration_summary.ppt USGS ECH2O calibration summary]
 
*[http://www.czen.org/files/ECH2O%20calibration%20protocol_CZEN.doc USGS  ECH2O probe calibration protocol (destructive harvest)]
 
*[http://www.czen.org/files/ECH2O%20calibration%20protocol_CZEN.doc USGS  ECH2O probe calibration protocol (destructive harvest)]
 +
*[http://www.sowacs.com sowacs.com] - the central resource for soil moisture measurement
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
+
*Bogena, HR; Huisman, JA; Oberdoerster, C; Vereecken, H. 2007. Evaluation of a low-cost soil water content sensor for wireless network applications. Journal of Hydrology, 344(1-2), 32-42, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.06.032.
 +
*Chanzy, A., Gaudu, J.-G., Marloie, O. (2012): [http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/12/7/9773 Correcting the Temperature Influence on Soil Capacitance Sensors Using Diurnal Temperature and Water Content Cycles.] Sensors 12, 9773-9790, DOI: 10.3390/s120709773.
 +
*Saito, T; Fujimaki, H; Yasuda, H; Inoue, M. 2009. Empirical Temperature Calibration of Capacitance Probes to Measure Soil Water. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL 73, 1931-1937, DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2008.0128.
  
 
[[Category:Equipment]]
 
[[Category:Equipment]]
 
[[Category:Soil Moisture]]
 
[[Category:Soil Moisture]]

Latest revision as of 10:38, 23 July 2012

EC10.jpg

Parameter to be measured:

Soil moisture

Method:

Capacitance

ECHO Probe Profile along a Soil Proilfe

[[Image:]]

Equipment:

  • EC-5
  • EC-10 (ECH2O)
  • EC-20

Advantages:

  • Relatively cheap
  • Easy to install
  • Compatible with many loggers

Disadvantages:

  • Only for low salinity soils (Decagon has developed newer ECH2O probes that are less sensitive to salinity issues, e.g. the EC-5)
  • Calibration needed
  • Small measurement volume compared to other sensors

What to watch out for:

  • Temperature sensitivity
  • Careful installation, air gaps have a sustainable influence on the measurement compared to other sensors because of the small measurement volume

Problems/Questions:

Links

Projects that used the above equipment:

Other related web sites:

References

  • Bogena, HR; Huisman, JA; Oberdoerster, C; Vereecken, H. 2007. Evaluation of a low-cost soil water content sensor for wireless network applications. Journal of Hydrology, 344(1-2), 32-42, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.06.032.
  • Chanzy, A., Gaudu, J.-G., Marloie, O. (2012): Correcting the Temperature Influence on Soil Capacitance Sensors Using Diurnal Temperature and Water Content Cycles. Sensors 12, 9773-9790, DOI: 10.3390/s120709773.
  • Saito, T; Fujimaki, H; Yasuda, H; Inoue, M. 2009. Empirical Temperature Calibration of Capacitance Probes to Measure Soil Water. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL 73, 1931-1937, DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2008.0128.